The BC Teacher’s union and the BC government both said Monday they want to avoid any further escalation of a dispute which, according to CBC News, is leaving parents across the province frustrated .[excerpt] B.C. Education Minister Peter Fassbender said he was grieved to see children pulled into a labour dispute, but firmly stated the government wouldn’t force a resolution.
“I have said consistently, [and] the premier has, we want a negotiated settlement. To rush to legislation is not where we’re going to go,” he told reporters in Victoria.
B.C. Teachers’ Federation president Jim Iker said he was hopeful that the heightened job action would pressure the employer to make a new offer.[CBC News“>source]
We have published below the most recent position of both sides in the dispute.
The Ministry of Education Says – Teacher bargaining information
Parents, students, teachers and administrators all want to see a negotiated settlement reached with the BCTF leadership. Unfortunately, negotiations sometimes require that the parties use the available labour relations tools, such as strikes and lockouts, to help reach an agreement. This information clarifies what the union’s strike and the employers’ response to the strike might mean to parents and students.
Q: What is going on? Is this a strike or a lockout?
BOTH. The BCTF leadership started stage 1 strike activities in April and will begin stage 2 rotating strikes starting May 26, closing every school across the province for one day in that week. In response to the BCTF leadership’s stage 1 strike action, BCPSEA, representing school boards in bargaining with the union, has issued a partial lock out that includes a pay reduction to reflect the work that is not being performed by BCTF members in compliance with their stage 1 strike. Unlike the BCTF’s rotating strikes, BCPSEA’s partial lockout does not mean locking the doors or lost instructional time. BCPSEA’s response to the BCTF’s strike is designed to avoid direct impacts to student safety and instructional time while reflecting the labour relations principle of reduced pay for reduced work.
Q: What are you telling teachers not to do as part of the partial lockout?
Consistent with the many duties that the BCTF leadership directed teachers not to perform as part of their stage 1 strike action, BCPSEA has formally outlined the time and duties they are not being paid to do as follows:
|BCTF leadership directed that during stage 1 job action teachers will not:||In response to stage 1 strike action BCPSEA
outlined that teachers will not:
|1. Be at a worksite prior to one hour before
commencement of instructional time and one hour
after the end of instructional time, other than for
pre-arranged voluntary activities.
|1. Start work at the school more than 45 minutes
before the start of their classes and not to continue
to work for more than 45 minutes after their classes
|2. Provide principals or administrators with
any routine printed, written, or electronic
|2. Engage in meetings with administrators and/
or respond to routine communications from
|3. Receive any printed, written, or electronic
communication from an administrator.
|3. Evaluate educational programs (this does not
include marking or report cards).
|4. Undertake any mandated supervision of students
outside of regularly scheduled classes, except as set
out by an essential services order.
|4. Attend a range of routine organizational meetings.|
|5. Attend any meetings with management other
than meetings of the worksite Joint Health and
|5. Engage in professional development outside the
|6. Substitute other duties in place of the work listed
Common site means a service is operating on school grounds, such as a daycare. Factors such as whether the daycare operates out of a stand alone building or whether it is staffed by unionized employees will determine if it can operate during the strike action.
The partial lockout does not impact summer school. The only way summer school would be affected is if the union continues its rotating strikes.
Parents and teachers can access more information on bargaining positions and strike impacts on the BCPSEA website at http://www.bcpsea.bc.ca/ or on the Ministry of Education website at: http://www.newsroom.gov.bc.ca/2014/02/teacher-bargaining-information.html
The Teachers say: Christy Clark’s lockout creates confusion
Why is BCPSEA locking out teachers?
The lockout appears to be a retaliatory move on behalf of BCPSEA. We are vocal advocates for improvements in public education including increased funding, better support for our students, and the return of class size, class composition, and staffing levels for specialist teachers. We also want a fair-wage increase after taking zero wage increases the last two years.
How can BCPSEA dock teachers’ pay? Is this allowed?
BCPSEA first said they would charge the BCTF $5 million per month to pay for the employer’s share of teacher benefits premiums while we conduct the Stage 1 job action. Then they said they would not do that and instead would cut every teachers’ pay by 5%. When we announced we were shifting to Stage 2 rotating strikes, they said they were going to partially lock teachers out and dock our pay by 10% for the days we were working. They want parents and the public to believe that if teachers are partially locked out that means teachers are not working and therefore deserve to be paid less. That is one of the arguments they will use at the Labour Relations Board. An LRB hearing is scheduled for May 29.
Why did BCPSEA say the lockout was a living document that needed tweaking?
The terms of the lockout are contradictory, confusing, and chaotic. Saying it needed tweaking was one way of covering up that the lockout doesn’t make much sense. It is poorly conceived and appears to have been hastily written by someone who is unfamiliar with day-to-day life in schools.
Why is it chaotic?
For one, the lockout notice says teachers cannot enter their workplaces earlier that 45 minutes before the bell. Teachers also must leave their schools no later than 45 minutes after the dismissal bell. The lockout also stipulates that teachers cannot work with students during lunch or recess or communicate with parents during that time either.
Many after school extra-curricular activities last longer than 45 minutes. The same goes for morning activities. Clubs and other kinds of small group activities are often scheduled during lunch. If a teacher is locked out at these times, they can’t very well work with kids then.
Didn’t BCPSEA say teachers could volunteer?
Yes, but they are contradicting their very own lockout. On the one hand they say, teachers can carry out extra-curricular activities because they say extra-curricular is voluntary. But then they say they are docking teachers’ pay because teachers cannot work during the lockout—the very time that teachers have for extra-curricular. How can they dock teachers’ pay for activities they acknowledge are voluntary? That is one example of why the lockout notice is confusing and illogical.
What about field trips? What about working during lunchtime?
Many field trips are full-day affairs. The lockout says teachers cannot work at lunch so locking teachers out at lunchtime jeopardizes field trips. Following the terms of BCPSEA’s lockout, who would supervise the students at lunchtime? If teachers stay and supervise, then they could become personally liable for any situation. In addition, it is unclear whether any WorkSafeBC coverage would be in effect because the teacher would not be officially working. The lockout puts both teachers and their students in a precarious position.
Even when teachers are not locked out, they may not be covered by WorkSafeBC for injuries sustained outside of normal working hours. Here’s an important precedent teachers need to know about:
The Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal recently denied a claim for a teacher who was injured while playing in a staff vs. student soccer game at lunch time in the school gymnasium.
They disallowed the claim on the basis that the soccer game was not part of the teacher’s employment. WCAT disallowed a similar claim last year when the injury occurred during a lunch time student vs. staff softball game.
Evidence that the teacher was “encouraged to participate with students to foster good relations” did not carry sufficient weight with the tribunal to support the claim.
Teachers should be aware that if they choose to participate in recreational, exercise, or sports-related activities outside of instructional time, their WCB claim may not be accepted if they are injured.
What else should I know about the lockout?
The lockout also says that teachers cannot do professional development on their own time, only during a scheduled non-instructional day. This makes no sense either. Does it mean a teacher cannot read a professional article, talk about it with other teachers, attend a workshop on a Saturday morning? Again, teachers are being docked pay for activities they do on their own time. And for activities that help us to continue to grow as teachers.
The lockout also prohibits teachers from meeting to plan and organize next year’s classes. This does not bode well for the coming school year.
Why are they locking out teachers the last three days of school?
To save money and to act punitively. It is a terrible way to end the school year.
How are teachers feeling about this whole thing?
Not great. The lockout will damage relationships between school districts and the teachers they employ. First, the collective agreement was stripped in 2002. From then until now, thousands of teaching jobs throughout the province have been cut. Schools have been closed.
We’ve seen an ongoing and steady underfunding of public education. We live it everyday and see how it affects our students. Waiting lists for services are the norm. Lots of kids miss out on the help they need. The lockout adds insult to injury. Please tell Christy Clark and Peter Fassbender and local school trustees to do the right thing. Bargain in good faith and fund public education the way it deserves.
Cover art from Wasteland News!